<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Substrate of Consciousness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.poptranshumanism.com/2009/11/the-substrate-of-consciousness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poptranshumanism.com/2009/11/the-substrate-of-consciousness/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:44:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://www.poptranshumanism.com/2009/11/the-substrate-of-consciousness/comment-page-1/#comment-755</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 02:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poptranshumanism.com/?p=1035#comment-755</guid>
		<description>Here are some flaws with your argument:
1. The majority of transhumanists are quite happy with their biological bodies, they would just prefer to live a bit longer than 75 years.
2. You cannot assume that a person&#039;s mind is inseperable from their brain, ever, as no tests have ever been performed, and the &quot;copy&quot; would perfectly emulate the original and insist that it IS the original.
3. Really, other than this I think that you actually have a pretty good page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are some flaws with your argument:<br />
1. The majority of transhumanists are quite happy with their biological bodies, they would just prefer to live a bit longer than 75 years.<br />
2. You cannot assume that a person&#8217;s mind is inseperable from their brain, ever, as no tests have ever been performed, and the &#8220;copy&#8221; would perfectly emulate the original and insist that it IS the original.<br />
3. Really, other than this I think that you actually have a pretty good page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
